<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adsense or Nonsense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://schinckel.net/2005/04/11/adsense-or-nonsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://schinckel.net/2005/04/11/adsense-or-nonsense/</link>
	<description>Like a fortune cookie, only without the fortune, and not a cookie.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: theMaab</title>
		<link>http://schinckel.net/2005/04/11/adsense-or-nonsense/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>theMaab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2005/04/11/adsense-or-nonsense/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I must say, that is quite funny.  I might need to pay more attention to the ads that come up w/ my adsense... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say, that is quite funny.  I might need to pay more attention to the ads that come up w/ my adsense&#8230; <img src='http://schinckel.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamR</title>
		<link>http://schinckel.net/2005/04/11/adsense-or-nonsense/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 02:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2005/04/11/adsense-or-nonsense/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Guess that's one of the many blunders of automated keyword selection.  I've had an ad like that (probably the same one) pop up on my site a few times. Needless to say, it was in the filter 15 seconds later. Gay blogging link on a technology blog. :/

But you've still got to give credit to Google's contextual ad selection ability.  It's usually right on the mark if it has a lot of context to choose from, producing the only kind of ads which are actually useful to the readers, and the only kind I've actually clicked on serious about what was on the other side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess that&#8217;s one of the many blunders of automated keyword selection.  I&#8217;ve had an ad like that (probably the same one) pop up on my site a few times. Needless to say, it was in the filter 15 seconds later. Gay blogging link on a technology blog. :/</p>
<p>But you&#8217;ve still got to give credit to Google&#8217;s contextual ad selection ability.  It&#8217;s usually right on the mark if it has a lot of context to choose from, producing the only kind of ads which are actually useful to the readers, and the only kind I&#8217;ve actually clicked on serious about what was on the other side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
