Comments on: Thoughts on the Probability of Existence

By: Matt

Matt — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:29:41 +0000

Cogito ergo sum.

Without thinking, I am nothing. If I think about being, that is thinking. That then, is being.

I pity you if you believe that only by not thinking you can be.

By: Am

Am — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:38:30 +0000

Seems you are thinking to much rather than being, for it is only in pure experience free from thoughts of you or other can you experience you and not a fiction of you.

By: Matthew Schinckel

Matthew Schinckel — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 00:18:28 +0000

Hey, I wish everything I wrote was as in-depth and intelligent-sounding as this post.

By: Armando

Armando — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 19:40:20 +0000

Wow. This blog is awesome. As a Determinist I find this very interesting. the last thing got me thinking….maybe what you are referring to is how when ever they tried to break the Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, by trapping a particle in a box(to try and find its location AND momentum)…then probability of the particle not being inside would collapse and then proceed to “quantum tunnel” to outside of the box. .. It’s like trying to catch a bar of soap by squeezing it. It will just slip out. maybe truth is like that as well…if you ever try to reduce it to becoming a false…it will continue being valid even if it means escaping trough something “seemingly” impossible. Also, if you apply other type of logical test to see what would happen if one was to achieve the ability to predict or know absolute things about this universe, truth might prevail over the paradox by ending this universe! or the individual attempting to predict its future. I say: fate would be a dangerous thing to know…it’s a good thing people can only see it as “past”.

By: Alan

Alan — Sun, 28 Aug 2005 09:21:13 +0000

Nice post m8