Comments on: Highlight Search Terms http://schinckel.net/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/ Like a fortune cookie, only without the fortune, and not a cookie. Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:02:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: juglar103 http://schinckel.net/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1196 juglar103 Fri, 12 May 2006 13:38:30 +0000 http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1196 Thank you very much. Thank you very much.

]]> By: Matthew Schinckel http://schinckel.net/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1186 Matthew Schinckel Wed, 10 May 2006 03:14:01 +0000 http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1186 You might be able to do this using the <code>{$content|replace:"No posts made":"There are no posts that meet your search criteria"}</code> trick. You might be able to do this using the {$content|replace:"No posts made":"There are no posts that meet your search criteria"} trick.

]]> By: juglar103 http://schinckel.net/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1182 juglar103 Tue, 09 May 2006 14:44:46 +0000 http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1182 Hi Matt One question off-topic. Is it posible personalize the "error message"?: Its mean: change "No posts made". Thank you. Hi Matt
One question off-topic.
Is it posible personalize the “error message”?:
Its mean: change “No posts made”.
Thank you.

]]> By: Matthew Schinckel http://schinckel.net/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1110 Matthew Schinckel Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:43:15 +0000 http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1110 bondage bondage

]]> By: Matthew Schinckel http://schinckel.net/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1109 Matthew Schinckel Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:39:27 +0000 http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1109 And now I get why it seemed to be breaking sometimes before: the plugin only works with referrers, not with the current URL for within-site searches. Luckily, I've got the code for the plugin, so I'll try to fix it and give it back to the Blogsome team. It should only be swapping a check around, so it checks first to see if there's an <code>&s</code> in the URL, and then the referrer if there isn't. And now I get why it seemed to be breaking sometimes before: the plugin only works with referrers, not with the current URL for within-site searches.

Luckily, I’ve got the code for the plugin, so I’ll try to fix it and give it back to the Blogsome team.

It should only be swapping a check around, so it checks first to see if there’s an &s in the URL, and then the referrer if there isn’t.

]]> By: Matthew Schinckel http://schinckel.net/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1108 Matthew Schinckel Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:33:23 +0000 http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1108 Too hard to do right now. There doesn't seem to be a way to get back references, which are required to replace case-insensitive text with the altered original, rather than the query as it was entered. That is, <b><em>Search</em></b> get replaced by <code><span class="hilite">search</span></code> not <code><span class="hilite">Search</span></code>. Too hard to do right now. There doesn’t seem to be a way to get back references, which are required to replace case-insensitive text with the altered original, rather than the query as it was entered.

That is, Search get replaced by <span class="hilite">search</span> not <span class="hilite">Search</span>.

]]> By: Matthew Schinckel http://schinckel.net/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1107 Matthew Schinckel Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:06:01 +0000 http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1107 Actually, I'm not so sure. It continues to highlight terms you've searched for last time, so it gets confusing. I'll rewrite it so it's a bit nicer. Actually, I’m not so sure. It continues to highlight terms you’ve searched for last time, so it gets confusing.

I’ll rewrite it so it’s a bit nicer.

]]> By: Matthew Schinckel http://schinckel.net/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1106 Matthew Schinckel Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:00:44 +0000 http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1106 Okay, now it's weird. It is already highlighting search terms from Google, even though… Aha! Moment of brilliance! I'd activated the Search Hilite plugin, and this was colouring my results. I must have chosen the same method of indicating the hilight as them! I'll be honest. That one is better than mine! Okay, now it’s weird. It is already highlighting search terms from Google, even though…

Aha! Moment of brilliance! I’d activated the Search Hilite plugin, and this was colouring my results. I must have chosen the same method of indicating the hilight as them!

I’ll be honest. That one is better than mine!

]]> By: Matthew Schinckel http://schinckel.net/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1105 Matthew Schinckel Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:55:53 +0000 http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1105 And I may have been wrong with regard to case sensitivity. Apparently, <strong>Search</strong> matches <em>Search</em> and <em>search</em>, but <strong>search</strong> doesn't match <em>Search</em>, only <em>search</em>. Still, I'll leave it implemented for now. Might be useful. I could also check the referrer, and if it's a search engine, highlight their search terms too. And I may have been wrong with regard to case sensitivity. Apparently, Search matches Search and search, but search doesn’t match Search, only search.

Still, I’ll leave it implemented for now. Might be useful.

I could also check the referrer, and if it’s a search engine, highlight their search terms too.

]]> By: Matthew Schinckel http://schinckel.net/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1104 Matthew Schinckel Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:41:29 +0000 http://schinckel.blogsome.com/2006/04/18/highlight-search-terms/#comment-1104 This works really well for the first search. For consecutive searches, it seems to get all mixed up as to what the search term is, and either highlights the previous search term, or both terms. This behaviour is inconsistent, and annoying. This works really well for the first search.

For consecutive searches, it seems to get all mixed up as to what the search term is, and either highlights the previous search term, or both terms.

This behaviour is inconsistent, and annoying.

]]>