Comments on: Why AFP is better than SMB. http://schinckel.net/2007/07/15/why-afp-is-better-than-smb/ Like a fortune cookie, only without the fortune, and not a cookie. Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:52:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Matt http://schinckel.net/2007/07/15/why-afp-is-better-than-smb/#comment-2808 Matt Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:44:46 +0000 http://schinckel.net/2007/07/15/why-afp-is-better-than-smb/#comment-2808 Aha. That sounds reasonable. I've actually moved my media server over to a MacOS machine, so I'm fairly happy with AFS at this stage. Aha. That sounds reasonable.

I’ve actually moved my media server over to a MacOS machine, so I’m fairly happy with AFS at this stage.

]]> By: tyler http://schinckel.net/2007/07/15/why-afp-is-better-than-smb/#comment-2802 tyler Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:59:12 +0000 http://schinckel.net/2007/07/15/why-afp-is-better-than-smb/#comment-2802 hey. stumbled across your site because i was interested in setting up an afp server on my ubuntu box (to utilize time machine without having to tether to a ext. drive) and saw that you had already given nfs a try. just a note. nfs might not be working for you because it authenticates through uid. on macs your uid is 501 by default and on the linux box its like 1000 (i think) just in case you ever reconsidered nfs in the future hey. stumbled across your site because i was interested in setting up an afp server on my ubuntu box (to utilize time machine without having to tether to a ext. drive) and saw that you had already given nfs a try.

just a note. nfs might not be working for you because it authenticates through uid. on macs your uid is 501 by default and on the linux box its like 1000 (i think)

just in case you ever reconsidered nfs in the future

]]>