Running more

Back in April, my second son was born. Prior to that, I was reliably running 2-4 hours per week, and clocking up 25-40km. Then, in addition to being really busy (as one is with a newborn), I had a patch of illness, which was followed a couple of months later by another bout. That second one stopped me exercising for pretty much all of July, and nearly half of August.

I’ve recently started to ramp up my running again: the one race I have ever competed in is in mid-September, and whilst I’m not in as good shape as I was when I did my PR, I’m hoping to do at least as well as I did last year. It looks better so far: last year I was only managing to run on Monday nights, in addition to Touch Football on Thursday (and Mel’s arse-kicking on Wednesdays). I’ve squeezed in a few more runs so far, and, whilst I’m still running a bit slow (hardly skipped below 5:00/km), I’m feeling fairly comfortable.

In reality, I’ll be happy if I come in under an hour in the race. If I manage to break 55:00, or even better, I’ll be stoked. My best time (48:52) is well beyond me, but maybe next year…

Avoiding SQL Antipatterns using Django (and Postgres)

The book SQL Antipatterns is one of my favourite books. I took the opportunity to reread it on a trip to Xerocon in Sydney, and as usual it enlightened me to thing I am probably doing in my database interactions.

So, I’m going to look at these Antipatterns, and discuss how you can avoid them when using Django. This post is intended to be read with each chapter of the book. I’ve used the section headings, but instead of the chapter headings, I’ve used the Antipattern headings. They are still in the same order, though.

It seems the printed version of this book is on sale now: I’m tempted to buy a few extra copies for gifts. Ahem, cow-orkers.

Logical Database Design Antipatterns

Format Comma-Separated Lists

This one is pretty simple: use a relation instead of a Comma Separated field. In the cases described in the book, a ManyToManyField is in fact simpler than a Comma Separated field. Django gets a gold star here, both in ease of use, but also in documentation about relations.

However, there may be times when a relation is overkill, and a real array is better. For instance, when storing data related to which days of the week are affected by a certain condition, it may make sense to store it in this way.

But we can do better than a simple Comma Separated field. Storing the data in a Postgres Array means we can rely on the database to validate the data, and allows searching. Similarly, we could store it in JSON, too.

I’ve maintained a JSONField for Django, although it’s not easily queryable. However, an ArrayField is coming in Django 1.8. There are alternatives already available if you need to use one now. I’ve got a project to mostly backport the django.contrib.postgres features to 1.7: django-postgres.

Things like JSON, Array and Hstore are a better solution than storing other-delimitered values in a straight text column too. With Django 1.7, it became possible to have lookups, which can leverage the DBMS’ ability to query these datatypes.

Always Depend on One’s Parent

Read chapter online.

Straight into a trickier one! And, Django’s documentation points out how to create his type of relation, but does not call out the possible issues. This book is worth it for this section alone.

So, how do we deal with trees in Django?

We can use django-mptt. This gives us (from what I can see) the “Nested Sets” pattern outlined in the book, but under the name “Modified Preorder Tree Traversal”.

I’m quite interested in the idea of using a Closure Table, and there are a couple of projects with quite different approaches to this:

  • django-ctt: uses a Model class you inherit from.
  • django-ct: better documented, but uses an unusual pattern of a pseudo-manager-thing.

Knowing me, I’m probably going to spend some time building a not-complete implementation at some point.

Update: Whilst I haven’t built an implementation of a Closure Table, I did implement recursive queries for an Adjacency List.

One Size Fits All

Using a field id for all tables by default is probably one of the biggest mistakes I think Django makes. And, as we shall see, we can’t yet avoid them, for at least a subset of situations.

Indeed, Django can use any single column for the primary key, and doesn’t require the use of a key column of name id. So, in my mind, it would have been better to use the <tablename>_id, as suggested in the book. Especially since you may also access the primary key attribute using the pk shortcut.

class Foo(models.Model):
    foo_id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)

However, it’s not currently possible to do composite primary keys (but may be soon), which makes doing the best thing for a plain ManyToManyField possible: indeed, you don’t control that table anyway, and if you remove the id column (and create a proper primary key), things don’t work. In practice, you can just ignore this issue, since you (mostly) don’t deal with this table, or the objects from it.

So, assuming we are changing the id column into the name suggested in the book, what does that give us?

Nothing, until we actually need to write raw SQL code, and specifically code that joins multiple tables.

Then, we are able to use a slightly less verbose way of defining the join, and not worry about duplicate columns named id:

SELECT * FROM foo_foo JOIN foo_bar USING (foo_id);

I’m still not sure if it’s actually worthwhile doing this or not. I’m going to start doing it, just to see whether there are any drawbacks (already found one in some of my own code, that hard-coded an id field), or any great benefits.

Leave out the Constraints

Within Django, it’s more work to create relations without the relevant constraints, and it’s not possible to create a table without a primary key, so we can just pass this one by with a big:

smile and wave, boys

Use a Generic Attribute Table

Again, it’s possible to create this type of a monstrosity in Django, but not easy. A better solution, if your table’s requirements change is to use migrations (included in Django 1.7), or a more flexible store, like JSON or Hstore. This also has the added advantage of being a column, rather than a related table, which means you can fetch it in one go, simply. Similarly, with Postgres 9.3, you can do all sorts of querying, and even more in 9.4.

Document or key stores are no substitute for proper attributes, but they do have their uses.

The other solution is to use Model inheritance, which Django does well. You can choose either abstract or concrete table inheritance, and with something like django-model-utils, even get some nice features like fetching only the subtypes when fetching a queryset of superclass models.

Use Dual-Purpose Foreign Key

Unfortunately, Django comes with a built-in way to do this: so-called Generic Relations.

Using this, it’s possible to have an association from a given model instance to any other object of any other model class.

“You may find that this antipattern is unavoidable if you use an object-relational programming framework […]. Such a framework may mitigate the risks introduced by Polymorphic Associations by encapsulating application logic to maintain referential integrity. If you choose a mature and reputable framework, then you have some confidence that its designers have written the code to implement the association without error.”

I guess we’ll just have to rely on the fact Django is a mature and reputable framework.

In all reality, I’ve used this type of relation once: for notifications that need to be able to refer to any given object. It’s also possible to use, say, a tagging app that had generic relations. But, I’m struggling to think of too many situations where it would be better than a proper relation.

I’ve also come across it in django-reversion, and running queries against objects from it is a pain in the arse.

Create Multiple Columns

Interestingly, the example for this Antipattern is the example I just used above: tags. And, this type of situation should be done in a better way: a proper relation, or perhaps an Array type. It all depends how good your database is at querying arrays. django.contrib.postgres makes this rather easy:

class Post(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(...)
    tags = ArrayField(models.CharField(...), blank=True)


What may not be so easy is getting all of the tags in use. This may be possible: I just haven’t thought of a way to do this yet. A nice syntax might be:


The SQL you might be able to use to get this could look like:

  array_agg(distinct t) AS tags
  SELECT unnest(tags) FROM posts
) t;

I’m not sure if there’s a better way to get this data.

Clone Tables or Columns

I can’t actually see that doing this in Django would be easy, or likely. It’s gotten me interested in some method of seamlessly doing Horizontal Partitioning as a method of archiving old data, and perhaps moving it to a different database. Specifically, moving old audit data into a separate store may become necessary at some point.

Partitioning using a multi-tenancy approach using Postgres’ schemata is another of my interests, and I’ve been working on a django-specific way to do this: django-boardinghouse. Note, this is a partial-segmentation approach, where some tables are shared, but others are per-schema.

Physical Database Design Antipatterns

Use FLOAT Data Type

Just don’t.

There’s a DecimalField, and no reason not to use it.

Specify Values in the Column Definition

The example the book uses is to define check constraints on a given question. Django’s approach is a bit different: the valid choices are defined in the column definition, but can be changed in code at any time. Any existing values that are no longer valid are fine, but any attempt to save an object will require it to have one of the newly valid choices.

This is both better and worse than the problem described in the book. There’s no way (short of a migration) to change the existing data, but maybe that’s actually just better.

Again, the best solution is just to use a related field, but in some cases this is indeed overkill: specifically if values are unlikely to change.

Assume You Must Use Files

I’m still 50-50 on this one. Basically, storing binary files in your database (a) makes the database much bigger, which means it takes longer to back it up (and restore it), and (b) means that it’s harder to do things like use the web server, rather than the application server, to serve static files (even those user-supplied, that must be authenticated).

The main disadvantage, of not having backups, is purely an operations issue.

The secondary disadvantage: the lack of transactionality is also easily solved: don’t delete files (unless necessary), and don’t overwrite them. If you really must, then use a Postres NOTIFY delete-file <filepath> or similar, and have a listener that handles that.

The other disadvantage, about SQL privilidges is mostly moot under Django anyway, as you are always running as the one database user.

Using Indexes Without a Plan

Indexes are fairly tangiential to an ORM: I’m going to pass over this one without too much comment. I’ve been doing a fair bit of index-level optimisations on my production database lately, in an effort to improve performance. Mostly, it’s better to optimise the query, as the likely targets for indexes probably already have them.

Query Antipatterns

Use Null as an Ordinary Value, or Vice Versa.

Python has it’s own None type/value, and using it in queries basically converts it into NULL. Django is a little annoying how at times it stores empty strings instead of NULL in string fields. I was playing around with making these into proper NULLs, but it seemed to create other problems.

At least there is no established pattern to use other values instead of NULL.

Reference Non-grouped Columns

Since I’m dealing with Postgres, I understand this one is not much of an issue. Your query will fail if you build it wrong. Which should be the way databases work.

Sort Data Randomly

Read this chapter online.

The problem of how to fetch a single random instance from a Model comes up every now and then on IRC, indeed, it did again last weekend. Unsurprisingly, I provided a link to this chapter.

One solution that is presented in the book is to select a single row, using a random offset:

import random
# Note: the initial version of this would fail since queryset.count()
# is the number of elements, randint(a, b) includes the value 'b',
# and queryset[b] would be out of range.
index = random.randint(0, queryset.count() - 1)
instance = queryset.all()[index]

This, converts to the query:


However, without an ordering, I believe this will still do a complete table seek. Instead, you want to order on a column with an index. Like the primary key:

instance = queryset.order_by('pk')[index]

It does take two queries, but sometimes two queries is better than one. Obviously, if your table was always going to be small, it may be better to do the random ordering:

instance = queryset.order_by('?')[0]

Pattern Matching Predicates

I’m sorry to say Django makes it far too easy to do this:


Becomes something like:

SELECT * FROM "table" WHERE "table"."foo" LIKE '%bar%';

In many cases, this will be fine, but as you can imagine, you may get surprising matches, or performance may really suck.

Using Postgres’s full-text search is relatively simple: you can quite easily make a custom field that handles this, and with Django 1.7 or later, you can even create your own lookups:

from django.db import models

class TSVectorField(models.Field):
    def db_type(self, connection):
        return 'tsvector'

class TSVectorMatches(models.lookups.BuiltinLookup):
    lookup_name = 'matches'
    def process_lhs(self, qn, connection, lhs=None):
        lhs = lhs or self.lhs
        return qn.compile(lhs)

    def get_rgs_op(self, connection, rhs):
        return '@@ to_tsquery(%s)' % rhs


Then, you are able, on a correctly defined field, able to do:


Which roughly translates to:

SELECT * FROM "table" WHERE (foo @@ to_tsquery('bar'));

It’s actually a little more complicated than that, but I have a working prototype at There is a field class, but also an example within the search sub-app.

Clearly, you’ll want to be creating the right indexes.

Solve a Complex Problem in One Step

By their very nature, ORMs tend to make this a little less easy to do. Because you don’t normally write custom code, this scenario is less common than you might see in a normal SQL access.

However, with Django, it is possible to write over-complicated queries, but also to use things like .raw(), and .extra() to write “Spaghetti Queries”.

However, it is worth noting that with judicious use of these features, you can indeed write queries that perform exceptionally well, indeed, far better than the ORM is able to generate for you. It’s also worth noting that you can write really, really bad queries that take a very long time, just using the ORM (without even doing things like N+1 queries for related objects).

Indeed, the “how to recognize” section of this chapter shows the biggest red flag I have noticed lately: “Just stick another DISTINCT in there”.

I’ve seen, first-hand how a .distinct() can cause a query to take a very long period of time. Removing the need for a distinct by removing the join, and instead using subqueries, caused a query that was taking around 17 seconds with a given data set to suddenly take less than 200ms.

That alone has forced me to reconsider each and every time I use .distinct() in my code (and probably explains why our code that runs queries against django-reversion) performs so horribly.

A Shortcut That Gets You Lost

I’ve used, in my SQL snippets in this post, the shortcut that is mentioned here: SELECT * FROM .... Luckily, Django doesn’t use this shortcut, and instead lists out every column it expects to see.

This has a really nice side-effect: if your database tables have not been migrated to add that new column, then whenever you try to run any queries against that table, you will have an error. Which is much more likely to happen immediately, rather than at 3am when that column is first actually used.

Application Development Antipatterns

Store Password in Plain Text

There is no, I repeat, no reason you should ever be doing this. It’s a cardinal sin, and Django has a great authentication and authorisation framework, that you can extend however you need it.

As noted in the legitimate uses section: if you are accessing a third-party system, you may need to store the password in a readable format. In this case, something like Oauth, if available, may make things a little safer.

Execute Unverified Input As Code

Read this chapter online.

Most of the risks of SQL Injection are mitigated when you use an ORM like Django’s. Of course, if you write .raw() or .extra() queries that don’t properly escape user-provided data, then you may still be at risk. .extra() in particular has arguments that allow you to pass an iterable of parameters, which will then be correctly escaped as they are added to the query.

Filling in the Corners

Educate your manager if (s)he thinks it’s a bad thing to have non-contiguous primary keys. Transaction rollbacks, deleted objects: there’s all sorts of reasons why there may be gaps.

Making Bricks Without Straw

It goes without saying that you should have error handling within your python code.

Make SQL a Second-Class Citizen

This is kind-of the point of an ORM: to remove from you the need to deal with creating complex queries in raw SQL.

Your Django models are the documentation of your table structure, or documentation can be generated from them. Your migrations files show the changes that have been made over time. Naturally, both of these will be stored in your Source Code Management system.

Clearly, as soon as you are doing anything in raw SQL, then you should follow the practices you do with the rest of your code.

Testing in-database is something I am a little bit interested in. As I move more code into the database (often for performance reasons, sometimes because it’s just fun), it would be nice to have tests for these functions. I have a long list of things in my Reading List about Postgres Unit Testing. Perhaps I’ll get around to them at some point. Integrating these with the Django test runner would be really neat.

The Model Is an Active Record

Django’s use of the Active Record is slightly different to Rails. In Rails, the column types in the database control what attributes are on the model, but in Django, the python object is the master. I think this is more meaningful, because it means that everything you need to know about an object is in the model definition: you don’t need to follow the migrations to see what attributes you have.

I do like the concept of a Domain Model: it’s an approach I’ve lightly tried in the past. Perhaps it is an avenue I’ll push down further at some point. In some ways, Django’s Form classes allow you to encapsulate this, but mostly business logic still lives on our Model classes.


So, how did Django do?

Pretty good, I’d say. The ones that were less successful either don’t really matter most of the time (primary key column is always called id, choices defined in the model), or you don’t really need to use them (Generic Relations, searching using LIKE %foo%, using raw SQL).

We do fall down a bit with files stored in the database, and fat models, but I would argue that those patterns work just fine, at least for me right now.

Liquid Templates and Django Templates

Note to self: when I get the error:

/Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/jekyll-0.11.2/bin/../lib/jekyll/convertible.rb:81:in `do_layout': undefined method `name' for #<Jekyll::Post:0x10f842e88> (NoMethodError)
	from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/jekyll-0.11.2/bin/../lib/jekyll/post.rb:189:in `render'
	from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/jekyll-0.11.2/bin/../lib/jekyll/site.rb:193:in `render'
	from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/jekyll-0.11.2/bin/../lib/jekyll/site.rb:192:in `each'
	from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/jekyll-0.11.2/bin/../lib/jekyll/site.rb:192:in `render'
	from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/jekyll-0.11.2/bin/../lib/jekyll/site.rb:40:in `_draft_process'
	from /Users/matt/Dropbox/Blog/_plugins/drafts.rb:15:in `process'
	from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/jekyll-0.11.2/bin/jekyll:250
	from /usr/local/bin/jekyll:19:in `load'
	from /usr/local/bin/jekyll:19

It’s probably because I have used django template tags in the {% (end)highlight %} blocks, and omitted the {% (end)raw %} stuff.

Leveraging HTML and Django Forms: Pagination of Filtered Results

Django’s forms are fantastic for parsing user input, but I’ve come up with a nice way to use them, in conjunction with HTML forms, for pagination, using the inbuilt Django pagination features.

It all stems from the fact that I’ve begun using forms quite heavily for GET purposes, rather than just for POST. Basically, anytime you have a URL that may have some parts of the query string that may need to be built, it’s simpler to use a form element, than to manually build up the url in your template.

Thus, where you may have something like:

<a href="{% url 'foo' %}?page={{ page }}">

It may be better do do something more like:

<form action="{% url 'foo' %}">
  <input type="hidden" name="page" value="{{ page }}">

Indeed, you can even use named buttons for submission, which will refer to the page. That is the key to the process outlined below.

Django comes with lots of “batteries”, including form handling and pagination. The Class Based Views (CBV) that deal with collections of objects will include pagination, although it is possible to use this pagination in your own views. For simplicity, we’ll stick with a simple ListView.

Let’s begin with that simple view: in our

from django.views.generic import ListView, DetailView

from .models import Person

person_list = ListView.as_view(

person_detail = DetailView.as_view(

Essentially, that’s all you need to do. You could use implied template names, but I almost never do this. The takeaway from this block is that we are stating the queryset that our ListView will use as the base, the template it should render, and the number of items per page.

I’ve stubbed out the person_detail view, just so we can refer to it in our urlconf, and then in turn in the template. Because of the simplicity of it, we could have just done all of this in our

Speaking of our, we have something like:

from django.conf.urls import url

import views

urlpatterns = [
    url(r'^people/$', views.person_list, name='person_list'),
    url(r'^people/(?P<pk>\d+)/', views.person_detail, name='person_detail'),

Then, in our template, we can render it as (ignoring the majority of the page):

<ul class="people">
  {% for object in object_list %}
      <a href="{% url 'person_detail' %}">
        {{ object }}
  {% endfor %}

But this doesn’t give us our pagination. It will only show the first ten results, with no way to access the others. All we need to do to access the others is to append ?page=X, but, as we will see, there is another way.

Typically, your pagination block might look something like:

<ul class="pagination">
    {% if page_obj.has_previous %}
      <a href="?page={{ page_obj.previous_page_number }}">
    {% else %}
    {% endif %}

  {% for page_number in paginator.page_range %}
    {% if page_number = page_obj.number %}
      <li class="active">
        <span>{{ page_number }}</span>
    {% else %}
        <a href="?page={{ page_number }}">
          {{ page_number }}
    {% endif %}
  {% endfor %}

    {% if page_obj.has_next %}
      <a href="?page={{ page_obj.next_page_number }}">
    {% else %}
    {% endif %}

Depending upon your CSS framework, if you use one, there may already be some pre-prepared styles to help you out with this.

This is all well and good, until you want paginated search results. Then, you can no longer rely on being able to rely on using ?page=N, as this would remove any search terms you were already using. Also, if you were using ajax to fetch and display stuff, you may need to use the whole URL, rather than just the query string.

Instead, we can use a Django form for searching, and just add in the pagination bits.

We will build a page that displays an optionally filtered list of people.

Our Person model will be deliberately simple:

from django.db import models

class Person(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=256)

Likewise, our form will be simple. All we need to do is have the form able to filter our queryset.

from django import forms

class PersonSearchForm(forms.Form):
    query = forms.CharField(label=_('Filter'), required=False)

    def filter_queryset(self, request, queryset):
        if self.cleaned_data['name']:
            return queryset.filter(name__icontains=self.cleaned_data['query'])
        return queryset

Finally, we will need to subclass a ListView. We’ll mixin from FormMixin, so we get the form-handling capabilities:

from django.views.generic.edit import FormMixin
from django.views.generic import ListView

class FilteredListView(FormMixin, ListView):
    def get_form_kwargs(self):
        return {
          'initial': self.get_initial(),
          'prefix': self.get_prefix(),
          'data': self.request.GET or None

    def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
        self.object_list = self.get_queryset()

        form = self.get_form(self.get_form_class())

        if form.is_valid():
            self.object_list = form.filter_queryset(request, self.object_list)

        context = self.get_context_data(form=form, object_list=self.object_list)
        return self.render_to_response(context)

There’s a little bit to comment on there: we override the get_form_kwargs so we pull our form’s data from request.GET, instead of the default.

We also override get, so we filter results if the form validates (which it will if there was data provided). We delegate responsibility for the actual filtering to the form class.

Everything else is just standard.

We will want to actually use this view:

people_list = FilteredListView.as_view(

Now we need to render this.

<form id="person-list-filter" action="{% url 'person_list' %}">
  <input name="{{ form.query.html_name }}" value="{{ form.query.value }}" type="search">
  <button type="submit" name="page" value="1">{% trans 'Search' %}</button>

<div class="results">
  {% include 'person/list-results.html' %}

You may notice that the search button will result in page=1 being used. This is deliberate.

Our person/list-results.html is just the same as what our person/list.html looked like before, with the addition of the pagination template inclusion.

{% include 'pagination.html' with form_target='person-list-filter' %}

<ul class="people">
  {% for object in object_list %}
      <a href="{% url 'person_detail' %}">
        {{ object }}
  {% endfor %}

Our pagination.html is very similar to how our other template above looked too, but using <button> elements instead of <a>, and we will disable those that should not be clickable. Also, the buttons contain an attribute indicating which form they should be bound to.

<ul class="pagination">
      form="{{ form_target }}"
      {% if page_obj.has_previous %}
        value="{{ page_obj.previous_page_number }}"
      {% else %}
      {% endif %}>

  {% for page_number in paginator.page_range %}
    <li class="{% if page_number == page_obj.number %}active{% endif %}">
        value="{{ page_number }}"
        form="{{ form_target }}"
        {% if page_number == page_obj.number %}
        {% endif %}>
        {{ page_number }}
  {% endfor %}

      form="{{ form_target }}"
      {% if page_obj.has_next %}
        value="{{ page_obj.next_page_number }}"
      {% else %}
      {% endif %}>

We are getting close now. This will be enough to have clicking on the next/previous or page number buttons resubmitting our search form, resulting in the page reloading with the correct results.

But we can do a bit better. We can easily load the results using AJAX, and just insert them into the page.

We just need one additional method on our View class:

class FilteredListView(FormMixin, ListView):
    # ...

    def get_template_names(self):
        if self.request.is_ajax():
            return [self.ajax_template_name]
        return [self.template_name]

    # ...

and one addition to our view declaration:

people_list = FilteredListView.as_view(

I’ll use jQuery, is it makes for easier to follow code:

// Submit handler for our form: submit it using AJAX instead.
$('#person-list-filter').on('submit', function(evt) {

  var form =;

    url: form.action,
    data: $(form).serialize(),
    success: function(data) {

// Because we are using buttons, which ajax submit will not send,
// we need to add a hidden field with the relevant page number
// when we send our request.
$('#person-list-filter').on('click', '[name=page]', function(evt) {
  var $button = $('button');
  var $form = $button[0].form;

  if (!$form.find('[type=hidden][name=page]')) {
    $form.append('<input type="hidden" name="page">');



That should do nicely.

There is another thing that we need to think about. If we leave the next/prev buttons, then we need to handle multiple clicks on those buttons, which fetch the subsequent page, and possibly cancel the existing AJAX request.

I do have a solution for this, too, although it complicates things a fair bit. First, we need to add some attributes to the next/prev buttons:

<ul class="pagination">
      form="{{ form_target }}"
      {% if page_obj.has_previous %}
        value="{{ page_obj.previous_page_number }}"
      {% else %}
      {% endif %}>

  {% for page_number in paginator.page_range %}
    <li class="{% if page_number == page_obj.number %}active{% endif %}">
        value="{{ page_number }}"
        form="{{ form_target }}"
        {% if page_number == page_obj.number %}
        {% endif %}>
        {{ page_number }}
  {% endfor %}

      form="{{ form_target }}"
      {% if page_obj.has_next %}
        value="{{ page_obj.next_page_number }}"
        data-stop-at="{{ paginator.num_pages }}"
      {% else %}
      {% endif %}>

And our click handler changes a bit too:

$('#person-list-filter').on('click', 'button[name=page]', function() {
  var page = parseInt(this.value, 10);
  var $form = $(this.form);
  // Only update the value of the hidden form.
  if (!$form.find('[name=page][type=hidden]')) {
    $form.insert('<input name=page type=hidden>');
  // Increment any prev/next buttons values by their increment amount,
  // and set the disabled flag on any that have reached their stop-at
  $form.find('[data-increment]').each(function() {
    this.value = parseInt(this.dataset.increment, 10) + page;
    // We want to disable the button if we get to the 'stop-at' value,
    // but this needs to happen after any submit events have occurred.
    if (this.dataset.stopAt) {
      setTimeout(function() {
        this.disabled = (this.value == this.dataset.stopAt);
      }.bind(this), 0);


Since this was posted, I have written a number of pages that use this pattern. Some of the improvements that could be made are listed below:

It’s possible to have these results automatically update as the user types. Obviously, this only makes sense if we have AJAX submission happening!

$('#person-list-filter').on('keyup', function() {

If you have lots and lots of results, you probably won’t want to show every button. Often you will see the first few, and a couple either side of the current page (and sometimes the last few). This is almost possible to do with pure CSS, but not quite. I do have a solution for this, but it’s probably worthy of a complete post of its own.

Another situation that is likely to happen is this:

  • User clicks on a page other than page 1 of results. Let’s say page N.
  • User enters text in search field which results in fewer than N pages of results being available.
  • User gets error message.

We can fix this with an overridden method:

class FilteredListView(FormMixin, ListView):
    # ...

    def paginate_queryset(self, queryset, page_size):
            return super(FilteredListView, self).paginate_queryset(queryset, page_size)
        except Http404:
            self.kwargs['page'] = 'last'
            return super(FilteredListView, self).paginate_queryset(queryset, page_size)

    # ...

You’ll also need to add in a get_prefix() method if you are using an old Django, but really you should just upgrade.

Updated: I’ve added in some more error checking into the templates, to prevent exceptions when attempting to render previous and next page links (thanks inoks).

Updated: I’ve changed to use the preferred urlpattern syntax. (thanks knbk).

Updated: Delegate to the form for filtering. Add discussion of other extensions. Add button[form] attributes.

More Cleartext Passwords

Update: I’ve since heard back from my health insurer. They are working to mitigate the risks outlined in the complaint below.

As such, and as an indicator of good faith on my behalf, I’ve removed links and mentions of them. Should they not follow through, this post will be restored, and more venom added!

More plain-text-shenanigans.

I complained some time ago to my health insurer:

I’m writing to complain again about your security practices.

You clearly store passwords in plain text: evidenced by the fact that the password reset process sends me my actual password, instead of doing a password reset, like every responsible company does.

Given the recent spate of security breaches, you really should consider improving this.

I received the following reply:

Dear Mr Schinckel,

Thank you for your email. Your feedback regarding the security of our Online Member Services has been noted.

Please rest assured that as a fund, we ensure that we adhere to the Privacy Act. The security of our members and their information is paramount to us, and systems operate in accordance with relevant legislation and guidelines. Our systems and processes are regularly reviewed and audited to ensure full adherence.

I didn’t do anything about it, but the email I received today made me think about it again.

So, here is the content of my complaint to them.

Consider this a formal complaint.

It also occurs to me that what you are claiming in your privacy policy is false.

[link to privacy policy, and content of privacy policy removed]

You clearly have not taken “reasonable steps to protect all personal information … from unauthorised access”. A simple, very reasonable step would be to store only hashes of passwords, generated using a per-password salt, instead of storing passwords in clear text.

Your storage of passwords in clear text, and then the further sending of those over email, which is inherently not encrypted, means that any administrator of any mail server between your server and the recipient would be able to view the username and password of a member, and masquerade as them.

Even if you encrypted passwords in a manner that means you were able to recover them, in order to send them over email, means that you are still open to attackers appropriating passwords, either in transit, or after gaining access to your systems. This includes having an encrypted database, or encrypted columns within the database.

You clearly have not ensured “that appropriate technical and organisational security measures, consistent with standard industry practice, are in place to attempt to safeguard the security…”, as what your password recovery feature indicates, you are storing passwords in clear text. As a professional Web Developer, I can assure you this is not in line with best practices with regard to software development.

Your claim of non-responsibility “for any breach of security caused by third parties” is laughable, given that any attacker that gains access to your member database automatically has access to all details of all members, and can store passwords, and access those member’s details at any time in the future unless they change their passwords.

You state that “[redacted] does not use any form of encryption … to protect information a member sends from their computer … and emails”. Did it not occur to you that the same is true of the reverse? That information you send over email is likewise not encrypted?

Claiming that your systems operate “in accordance with relevant legislation” is a cop-out. All it does is show that the legislation is out of date.

Please take my complaints seriously. Please fix your security.


Plain-text bad-news

For the past few years, I’ve run in the City-Bay, Adelaide’s largest Fun Run.

This year, when entering, I needed to reset my password.

Imagine my surprise when they sent me my password in plain text.

Then, imagine my surprise, or lack of it, when they sent me:

Dear Matthew,

We would like to advise that we have removed access to our online entry system after customers reported data missing from their records. Although investigations are underway, we would like to advise no financial information of race entrants is stored on our system and is therefore not at risk.

We recommend that you change the password you have used on our website (once it is deemed safe to reopen). As an added precaution we also advise that you change your password on any other website it is used.

Thank you for your understanding and continued interest in our event,

Kind Regards,

City-Bay Fun Run team

Well, you know, if you store passwords, in plain text, then you are just asking for trouble.



Review Django Essentials

Django Essentials. Note it appears the name of this book has been changed from “Getting started with Django”.

I’ll be clear from the outset: I have some pretty strong issues about the first part of this book, and I’m going to be quite specific with the things that I think are wrong with it. Having said that, the later chapters are far better than the earlier ones.

I am not sure, however, that it’s any more accessible than the official documentation. There’s probably a market for a more thorough tutorial than the one on the Django website, however, I’m not sure this book, as it stands, is that tutorial.

How could this book be better?

I think it gets bogged down providing detail in areas that are just not that important at that point in time. I also think it misses a good overview of the product that is being built: indeed it’s never clear, even after completing the book, exactly what the product is supposed to do.

In my opinion, the code examples are hard to read. This is a combination of the styling of the source code, and the layout. That bold, blue is quite jarring in comparison to the rest of the text, and the repeated lack of PEP8 compliance, especially when coupled with reading it on a narrow device, make it hard to follow the code. Multiple code blocks (which should be in separate files) flow together, making it hard to see where one stops and the next begins.

The book fails early on to push some basic Python standards and best practices. In some cases these are addressed later on, however it is not obvious what is gained by not starting from this point. Similarly, there are some security issues that should never have passed through editing. Again, these are addressed later, but I feel that the damage has already been done. Friends don’t let friends store passwords in plain text; and very little is gained by disabling the CSRF protection.

But it’s not just the source code that seems lacking. The technical translation at times varies between the obtuse and the absurd. Early chapters in particular (the ones that I think are more important when teaching basic concepts) contain sentences or paragraphs that required me to re-read several times in order for me to be able to translate it into something that made sense to me. And I’ve been writing Django code for about 6 years (and Python code for probably another 6 before it).

Would I recommend it?

After hitting the plain-text-password section, I said no. I actually have a couple of guys much newer to Django than me at work, and I did not want them to read the book at that point.

However, after I’d cooled down, and actually started to draft this review, I re-read the start, and read the rest. There is some good information, but I’m not sure that it’s presented in a way that is better than the official documentation, or some other resources out there.

So, I’m really not sure I’d recommend it to a beginner. There are too many things early in the book that set up for future failures (or at least, unlearning). And I’m not sure I’d recommend it to an intermediate developer. It’s not that it’s bad (with the caveats below), it’s just not as good as what you can read on the Django website.

Some of the more important specific issues that I feel are wrong with this book follow. These are often things that beginners struggle with. You’ll notice less stuff about the later chapters. That’s because they are better.

Code standards.

Throughout the book, there are inconstencies with how individual models and modules are named. Whilst this seems pedantic, computers are pedantic, when it comes to textual source code. It does matter if you use Work_manager in one place, and the Workmanager in another.

Further, in Python, we always (unless the project we are working on has different standards) use snake_case for module names, TitleCase for class names, and snake_case again for variables, methods and functions, and ANGRY_SNAKE_CASE for constants. There’s just no reason to go against these guidelines.

Okay, I may have made up the name ANGRY_SNAKE_CASE.

Finally, Python code should be compliant to PEP8. I’m not sure that a single line of code in this book would pass through a PEP8 checker.


The section on “The MVC Framework” (tip: Django isn’t) seems superfluous. It would be far better to avoid this term, and instead describe the typical flow of data that one might see in a request-response cycle handled by Django:

  1. The client sends a request to the server
  2. The server passes the request to the correct view function (according to the url)
  3. The view function performs the required work, and returns an HttpResponse object.
  4. The HttpResponse object is sent back to the server.

Depending upon the view, it may do any or all of the following:

  • Process data provided by the client using a Form
  • Load and/or save data to/from the database
  • Render an HTML template or return a JSON (or XML) response.
  • Perform any other action that is required

The whole concept of a Controller doesn’t really make sense in the context of a web page, although purely within the client-side of a Single-Page-Application it could.


I’ve written about installation before, notably discussing how every project should be installed into a new virtualenv. Indeed, I even install every command-line application in it’s own environment. And, most of the experienced Pythonistas I have come across always use a new virtualenv for each project, both in development and in deployment. So it was worriesome to see a non-best-practice approach used for installation.

Although this is addressed later in the book (in the chapter on deployment), I fail to understand the benefit of not mentioning it now. There are so many reasons to use virtualenv in development, and none I can think of for avoiding it.


There are two things in this book that set off alarm bells for me, with respect to security. I’ve mentioned them above, but I’ll go into a little more detail.

The more minor error is the disabling of CSRF checking. The inbuilt Django CSRF protection ensures a range of attacks are ineffective, and the mental cost of using this protection is fairly low: in any view that you are POSTing back to the server, you need to include the CSRF token. This is usually done as a form field, using the csrf_token template tag.

Disabling it is almost never a good idea.

Suggesting that you disable it “just for now” as the only thing you change in the initial settings file is even worse. A beginning programmer may begin routinely disabling CSRF protection as they start a new project, and not re-enabling it. Bad form.

The severe error is storing user passwords in plain text. This flaw is so basic that, even though it is “fixed” later in the book, as is CSRF protection, by then I feel it is too late. Even hinting that either of these things is acceptable to do as an interim measure (do you have any idea how much “interim” or temporary code I have in production still, years after it was written?) makes me really struggle to continue reading.

However, I am glad I did.

URL routing and regular expressions

This book contains a reasonable explanation of regular expressions, but I think it would have been better suited to have a more concrete set of examples of how regular expressions can be used for URL routing in Django. For instance:




You could use a series of examples, like these, to describe some of the key rules of regular expressions, and at the same time discuss parameters. Alternatively, you could skip regular expressions at all at this point in time, and use simple strings.

When discussing URL routing, the following paragraph is a great example of a failure to explain what is essentially a simple process.

“After having received a request from a web client, the controller goes through the list of URLs linearly and checks whether the URL is correct with regular expressions. If it is not in conformity, the controller keeps checking the rest of the list. If it is in conformity, the controller will call the method of the corresponding view by sending the parameters in the URL.”

Phrased in a simpler manner:

“The URL resolver looks at each pattern in the order it is defined. If the regular expression of the url route matches the request’s path, the matching view method is called with the request object and any other parameters defined, otherwise it is passed on to the next route.”


This book presents a reasonable discussion of the Django template language. There are some parts that made me do a double-take (legacy of templates? Oh, you mean inheritance), and there are lots of important typos, missing characters, or just plain wrong source code.

And then there’s render_to_response.

Back in the day, we used to use a function called render_to_response(), which required you to manually pass a RequestContext instance to it: we have since moved on to render(). There is no need really to mention render_to_response() in anything other than a footnote: “You might see older code that uses…”

Talking about the context itself is good, but I think it should be more explicit: “You pass three arguments to render(): the request object, the template path and a dict containing the variables from your view that you want available in the rendering context”.

Oh, and later in the book, locals() is passed as the context. The Zen of Python: explicit is better than implicit. Yes, in the box immediately afterward, it is suggested that you don’t do this.

Doing something, and then suggesting that you don’t do it is counterproductive.


Django’s ORM gets some criticism at times. I find it’s mostly good enough for my needs, indeed, it sometimes does a better job of writing queries than me. However, it is an Object Relational Mapper, and discussing how that works is simple terms would probably be useful. It’s not strictly necessary to have a strong background in relational databases and SQL to use correctly, but understanding some of the implications of how accessing things from the ORM can cause issues, or indeed, how the data is even represented in the database can only be a positive.

“To make a connection between databases and SQL, we can say that a model is represented by a table in the database, and a model property is represented by a field in the table.”

Cumbersome language again, and not totally wrong, but probably slightly misleading. Perhaps:

”…a Model class is represented by a table in the database, and an instance of that Model is represented by a row/tuple. Fields on the model (which appear as special attributes) are the columns of that row.”

A discussion of south is also somewhat welcome. Even though the soon to be released Django 1.7 contains a superior (but written by the same person) implementation of migrations, it’s certainly still worth understanding a little about how south works.

However, there is one false statement when discussing south:

“Never perform the Django syncdb command. After running syncdb --migrate for the first time, never run it again. Use migrate afterwards.”

This is a broken statement. If you were to add a new app that did not have migrations, then without a syncdb command, the tables for it’s models would not be created.

This chapter suddenly gets a whole lot worse as soon as a model is defined with a plain-text password field, but I’ve already discussed that.


I spend a lot of time trying to talk people out of using the admin module as anything other than a top-level admin tool. Really, this is a tool that is fantastic for viewing and maniplating data in the early stages of development, and great for emergency access for a developer or trusted admin to view or change data on a live system, but trying to push too much into it is problematic. I say that as someone who has a project that relies far too much on the admin.

It’s also hard to not discuss the admin, as it really is a great tool, but it’s really important to understand it’s limitations.

I quote Django core contributor Russ Keith-Magee:

“Django’s admin is not meant to be the interface for your website”


Interestingly, the chapters on QuerySets and Forms are actually far better than those preceeding. The source code isn’t formatted any better, but it really does seem that the translations make (mostly) more sense.

I do think the manner of adding data to the database is bunkum, however. Given that we just covered the admin interface, it would make sense to use this to add some data, before looking at QuerySets. And we could delve into shell in order to illustrate how QuerySets, their various methods, and some model methods actually work.

And while we are on anti-patterns: queryset[:1].get() is pointless. You might as well just use queryset[0]. It is exactly the same SQL, and easier to read.


And then we get to Forms. I’m a really big fan of Django’s form handling: it’s something that makes dealing with user input much safer, and simpler. And this chapter explains that, but, from an educational perspective, I’m cautious that showing someone the wrong way to do something first is counter-productive.

Sure, I understand that it makes a point, and having done something a laborious, error-prone way for some time, and then being shown a safer, faster, easier method is eye-popping, but I fear that for some percentage of readers, they will get a takeaway that not using Forms is a valid choice.

Even beginning with a ModelForm is probably a nice approach, as you can get a lot of functionality with almost no code at all.


The section on Class Based Views is okay too. These are something else that are often hard to understand, and the initial official documentation on them was sadly lacking. Once you have your head around how they work they can be really powerful, and this book takes the right approach in suggesting caution about not always using them. Similarly, it is great that these were not used as a starting point.

However, I find that the explanations and descriptions are not always clear. Certainly as an experienced Django user I can read and understand what is going on, but as a beginner I think this chapter would be hard to follow. Perhaps a simple discussion about what the different CBV are used for, and how the ViewClass.as_view() pattern works, and why it is required, and then some examples.

Perhaps a better approach would have been to have written Model and Form classes earlier, and then writing the function-based views to CRUD those objects, and then rewriting the exact same views using CBV.


Although far less impressive that the admin, I think that auth is a more important module. Especially now given we can easily swap out auth.User, to get the desired user functionality, I think this is something that should be given more weight. It doesn’t need to necessarily come before the chapter about the admin, but it should be discussed, or at least introduced, before anything is done with a User-ish model.

I think this book does not do justice to Django.contrib.auth. There are lots of views and forms that can (and should) be used to save writing your own code, which is more likely to have bugs. Also, even if the basic User model is used in the example, a discussion of how easy it is to swap out, and get “email as username” functionality is certainly deserved.


I’m probably 50-50 on the AJAX chapter. I guess I understand why you’d want to include a chapter on it, but I worry that this chapter maybe doesn’t do enough. If it’s an introduction to AJAX I’m not sure it seems up to that.

I do often use jQuery, but it’s probably not too tricky to rewrite the code to delete an object using vanilla Javascript. And if you are going to use jQuery, you should get the idioms right.

var cases = $('nav ul li').each(function() {

Can easily be written:

$('nav ul li').addClass('nav_item');

And we probably shouldn’t use $(foo).html($(foo).html() + bar), when really we want to use $(foo).append(bar).

Also, I don’t think that using csrf_exempt is a great idea: the official documentation has details about how to use AJAX and still keep CSRF protection.

Thanks to:

  • Maior in #django for proofreading.

Dear ABC, please unbreak iView

Dear ABC,

The latest iOS iView apps use a custom media player, rather than the system supplied one. This actually degrades performance and usability in a few areas.

Specifically, when the stream is still loading, and you select AirPlay, then it will sometimes not actually send to the target device (and will not play on the local device either). This did not (to my recollection) occur with the old version.

Even more annoying, when attempting to scrub to a later point within the programme, it would more often than not just revert back to the previous point (prior to scrubbing). This happened about 60% of the time I was using the app last night. Again, this is something I have not seen when using either the old iview app, or other apps that use the default media player controls (but is something I see on apps that use custom players, such as the AU commercial channels’ apps).

Finally, after interacting with the controls, they do not fade after a period of time. Again, this is a significant regression compared to the previous version(s), and standard media controls.



(Note: I’ve also posted this as a complaint on